{"id":77,"date":"2016-09-15T21:05:29","date_gmt":"2016-09-15T21:05:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cms.eas.ualberta.ca\/leighton-lab\/?page_id=77"},"modified":"2016-10-14T22:31:13","modified_gmt":"2016-10-14T22:31:13","slug":"projects","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/cms.eas.ualberta.ca\/leighton-lab\/projects\/","title":{"rendered":"Projects"},"content":{"rendered":"

Taphonomy and Predation
\n<\/strong>Leighton et al. 2016<\/a><\/p>\n

An ongoing focus of research in our lab has been evaluating different measures of predation. In particular, I\u2019ve been an advocate for measuring predation traces for some time. While much of our research has been focused on repair frequency (check out the Molinaro et al<\/a>. study for a modern baseline study of repairs), a major concern with using repairs is that repairs are, by definition, the result of failed attacks. So we\u2019ve also explored other predation traces, and recently, we finished a project examining shell fragmentation rates in the modern.<\/p>\n

There is no shortage of shell fragments in many marine systems, both modern and ancient. However, opinions on what is the primary cause of fragmentation differ a lot, and often are dependent on the researcher\u2019s background: sedimentologists tend to assume that most fragmentation is a function of transport, whereas marine biologists often assume that fragmentation is a function of crushing predation. In fact, this project started as the result of a friendly disagreement during a committee meeting for one of my Ph.D. students. The big problem with fragmentation is that everyone has assumed that we can\u2019t distinguish fragments caused by transport from those that originated during predation. Using a combination of tumbling experiments and modern field data collected from localities of known wave-energy and predation intensity, we demonstrated that (a) transport-fragments will have at least one rounded edge, and that predation-fragments will have only sharp or intact edges; and (b) that the relative proportions of these two mechanisms varies predictably with existing wave-energy and predation gradients. This result was obtained independently for both bivalves and gastropods.<\/p>\n

\"FragmentCategories\"
Some examples of the shell or fragment edge types: A. Intact (original). B. Rounded and abraded edges. C. Sharp, fractured edges. D. Combination of sharp (inset) and rounded edges. This fragment would be categorized as Rounded & Sharp (R&S), indicative of transport. E, F. Fragments with combinations of intact (upper inset of E) and sharp (lower inset of E, upper inset of F) edges. This fragment would be categorized as Intact & Sharp (I&S), indicative of crushing predation.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"FragmentResults\"
Map and pie-diagrams showing proportions of fragment categories at each locality. BB, SB, and DI-ex were three wave-exposed localities (max flow velocities > 1.0 m\/s); while GI, SP, and DI-sh were three quiet-water localities (max flow velocities < 0.1 m\/s). Based on multiple, earlier studies, predation is known to be greater at the quiet-water localities.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

For bivalves (pies on left of each box), dots indicate All-Rounded (AR) or Rounded & Sharp (R&S) = transport. Stripes indicate All-Sharp (AS) or Intact & Sharp (I&S) = predation.
\nFor gastropods (pies on right side of each box), darker shades indicate AR or R&S, while lighter shades indicate AS or I&S.<\/p>\n

There is a greater proportion of transport-fragments in high-energy settings, whereas predation-fragments are more common in the low-energy, high-predation settings than in the high-energy settings. This is good news \u2013 it should be possible to rank samples in terms of predation pressure. Curiously, this sort of approach has already been used in paleontological studies, but this is the first example providing a modern baseline to ground-truth the method. The paper was published in the Journal of the Geological Society (Leighton et al. 2016<\/a>). Compare these results to our earlier work on repair, described below.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Taphonomy and Predation Leighton et al. 2016 An ongoing focus of research in our lab has been evaluating different measures of predation. In particular, I\u2019ve been an advocate for measuring predation traces for some time. While much of our research […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-77","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cms.eas.ualberta.ca\/leighton-lab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/77","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cms.eas.ualberta.ca\/leighton-lab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cms.eas.ualberta.ca\/leighton-lab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cms.eas.ualberta.ca\/leighton-lab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cms.eas.ualberta.ca\/leighton-lab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/cms.eas.ualberta.ca\/leighton-lab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/77\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":186,"href":"https:\/\/cms.eas.ualberta.ca\/leighton-lab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/77\/revisions\/186"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cms.eas.ualberta.ca\/leighton-lab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}